Skip to content

Lontevis Blog

Maximize retirement income. Minimize ruin probability — withdrawal optimization.

·General

$465,000 in Retirement Savings at 65: Bond Ladder vs Annuity vs Dividend Income — Can You Build a $40,000/Year Income Floor?

Is $465,000 enough to retire on? We run the income floor math across three strategies — annuity, bond ladder, and dividend income — to show exactly how much income each generates at 65, why Social Security timing changes the entire calculation, and what 'rich' actually means in retirement math.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

$1.3M at 63: How Sequence Risk + Unexpected Healthcare Costs Create a 44% Ruin Rate — and the 3 Withdrawal Strategies That Survive a Year-1 Bear Market

A year-1 bear market on a $1.3M portfolio at 63 can push your ruin rate to 44% — especially when healthcare costs force extra withdrawals at exactly the wrong moment. Here's how three withdrawal strategies compare under real pressure, and why your Social Security timing decision changes the math entirely.

Read more →
·General

4% Rule vs Bucket Strategy vs Guardrails on a $1.3M Portfolio: Which Withdrawal Method Survives a Fed Rate-Hold at 65?

Comparing the 4% rule, bucket strategy, and guardrails withdrawal methods on a $1.3M portfolio at 65 — with specific dollar math showing how Fed rate policy, tax bracket management, and annuity floors change which strategy wins.

Read more →
·General

Roth Conversion at 63 in a Down Market: How Converting $75,000/Year From a $1.3M IRA Avoids IRMAA and Saves $104,000 Before RMDs Hit at 73

A market downturn at 63 isn't just a setback — it's a Roth conversion discount. Here's the exact math on how converting $75,000/year from a $1.3M IRA avoids IRMAA surcharges and cuts $104,000 in lifetime taxes before RMDs force the issue at 73.

Read more →
·General

4% Rule vs Guardrails vs Bucket Strategy on a $1.1M Portfolio: Which Withdrawal Method Survives a Bear Market Without Pushing You Into the 24% Tax Bracket?

Comparing the 4% rule, guardrails, and bucket strategy on a $1.1M portfolio at age 63 — including Monte Carlo ruin rates, real tax bracket math, and how Social Security timing shifts which method wins.

Read more →
·General

Inherited IRA 10-Year Rule + SECURE 2.0 RMD at 73: How a $350,000 Inheritance Triggers a $58,000 Tax Spike — and the 7-Year Roth Conversion Window to Prevent It

SECURE 2.0 pushed RMDs to age 73, but if you've inherited an IRA under the 10-year rule, two income events can collide and drive you into the 24% bracket with an IRMAA surcharge on top. Here's the math — and the conversion window that defuses it.

Read more →
·General

No Pension? How to Build a $52,000/Year Guaranteed Income Floor at 65 With a Bond Ladder, Dividend Portfolio, or Annuity on $1.2M

If you're retiring without a pension on $1.2M, you need a strategy to replace it. Here's the break-even math on three income floor approaches — annuity, bond ladder, and dividend portfolio — and why your tax bracket, health, and Social Security timing determine which one wins.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

Sequence of Returns Risk on a $1.4M Portfolio at 63: How a Year-1 Bear Market Creates a 52% Ruin Rate — and Why Withdrawal Order Is the Hidden Fix

A bear market in your first year of retirement can destroy a $1.4M portfolio even with a modest withdrawal rate. Here's what Monte Carlo simulations show — and how flipping your withdrawal sequence cuts ruin probability by more than half.

Read more →
·General

Roth Conversion at 64 in a Down Market: How $85,000/Year From a $1.1M IRA Avoids IRMAA and Saves $43,000 Before RMDs Hit at 73

A $1.1M traditional IRA at 64 is quietly building toward a costly RMD collision at 73 — and a down market is actually the best time to fix it. Here's the full bracket math on a 6-year Roth conversion plan that saves $43,000 in lifetime taxes while staying clear of the IRMAA cliff.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

Social Security at 62 vs 67 vs 70 on $1.3M Saved: Break-Even Ages, Spousal Survivor Math, and Why Rising Inflation Tips the Scale Toward Delay

Claiming Social Security at 62 vs 70 can swing lifetime income by $175,000+. Here's the break-even math, spousal survivor strategy, and why tariff-driven inflation makes the delay argument stronger than ever for a couple with $1.3M saved.

Read more →
·General

4% Rule vs Guardrails vs Dynamic Withdrawal: How 2026 Inflation Threatens a $1.2M Portfolio's Safe Withdrawal Rate at 63

March 2026 CPI data is running hotter than expected, pushing 2027 Social Security COLA estimates higher and stress-testing every fixed withdrawal plan. Here's how three strategies hold up on a $1.2M portfolio — and which one survives depends entirely on your specific numbers.

Read more →
·General

SECURE 2.0 RMD Age 73 + Rising 2027 COLA: Why a $1.3M Traditional IRA Creates a $75,000 Avoidable Tax Bill Without Roth Conversions

SECURE 2.0 pushed RMDs to age 73, but rising 2027 COLA projections mean more Social Security income stacks directly on top of forced distributions — and a $1.3M traditional IRA can generate a $75,000 avoidable tax bill that a Roth conversion window could have prevented.

Read more →
·General

Bond Ladder vs Dividend Income vs Annuity at 65: Which Strategy Fills a $54,000/Year Retirement Income Gap When Inflation Runs at 4%?

With 2027 COLA estimates rising on energy-driven inflation, retirees at 65 face a critical question: which income floor strategy actually keeps pace? We run the math on bond ladders, dividend portfolios, and SPIAs for a $1.2M portfolio with a $54,000/year income gap.

Read more →
·General

Traditional IRA vs Roth by April 15: How the $8,000 Contribution Decision at 62 Ripples Into IRMAA Surcharges and a $71,000 Annual RMD at 73

With the April 15 IRA contribution deadline here, choosing traditional vs Roth isn't just about today's tax deduction — it sets the trajectory for your RMD load, IRMAA exposure, and lifetime tax bill a decade from now.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

Social Security at 62 vs 70 With $900K in Savings: The $137,000 Lifetime Gap, COLA Math, and Spousal Survivor Strategy

For a married couple with $900K saved and a $2,200/month PIA, the difference between claiming Social Security at 62 versus 70 reaches $137,000 in lifetime income by age 90 — before COLA compounds the gap further. Here's the break-even math, survivor strategy, and portfolio bridge analysis.

Read more →
·General

401(k)-Heavy at 65: Annuity vs Bond Ladder vs Dividend Income for a $57,000/Year Retirement Income Gap on $1.3M

When most of your $1.3M sits in a pre-tax 401(k), building a retirement income floor the wrong way can cost you $80,000+ in avoidable taxes. Here's how annuity, bond ladder, and dividend income strategies compare — with the math.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

Sequence of Returns Risk on a $1.3M Portfolio: How a Year-1 Bear Market Creates a 47% Ruin Rate — and 3 Withdrawal Strategies That Fix It

A single bad year at the wrong moment can turn a healthy $1.3M retirement portfolio into a depleted one by 84. Here's the math behind sequence of returns risk — and three withdrawal strategies that dramatically improve your odds of surviving a bear market in early retirement.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

Claiming Social Security at 62 vs 70 With $1.1M Saved: The $174,000 Lifetime Difference, Spousal Strategy, and What a Bear Market Does to the Math

For a $2,800/month Social Security benefit, the difference between claiming at 62 and waiting until 70 can exceed $174,000 in lifetime income — but a bear market in your bridge years changes everything. Here's the full break-even math.

Read more →
·General

Dynamic Withdrawal vs 4% Rule on $1.3M: How Social Security Timing Changes Which Strategy Survives a Bear Market at 63

Running a $1.3M retirement portfolio at 63 on a 6% withdrawal rate during a bear market? The right withdrawal strategy — 4% rule, guardrails, or bucket — depends entirely on when you claim Social Security. Here's the math.

Read more →
·General

SECURE 2.0 RMD Age 73 + Dead Fiduciary Rule: Should You Roll Over Your $850,000 401(k) to an IRA?

The DOL fiduciary rule just died — again. Here's the math on whether rolling your $850,000 401(k) to an IRA under SECURE 2.0's new RMD rules actually helps you or just helps your broker.

Read more →
·General

Annuity vs Bond Ladder vs Dividend Income at 65: Which Strategy Fills a $44,000/Year Retirement Gap on a $1.1M Portfolio With the Lowest Tax Bill?

A $1.1M portfolio and $33,600/year in Social Security still leaves a $44,400 income gap. Here's how a SPIA, a 10-year bond ladder, and a dividend portfolio each fill it — and which strategy costs $106,000 less in taxes over a 20-year retirement.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

Sequence of Returns Risk on a $1.4M Couples Portfolio: How a Year-1 Bear Market Creates a 54% Ruin Rate — and Why Social Security Timing Is the Fix

A year-1 bear market turns a $1.4M couples retirement portfolio into an 8.3% withdrawal rate overnight. Here's the math on ruin probability, the Social Security timing decision that cuts your risk in half, and why most couples never have this conversation before they need to.

Read more →
·General

Roth Conversion + Capital Gains Harvesting at 65: How to Cut $54,000 in Retirement Taxes Before RMDs Hit at 73

The 8-year window between retirement and your first RMD at 73 is the most powerful tax optimization period of your life. Here's the math on combining Roth conversions with 0% capital gains harvesting to cut $54,000 in lifetime taxes on a $1.5M IRA.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

Social Security at 62 vs 67 vs 70: Break-Even Math for a $2,400/Month Benefit and Spousal Claiming Strategy

For a $2,400/month FRA benefit, claiming at 62 vs 70 is a $183,000+ lifetime difference — but the right answer depends on your health, portfolio, and spousal situation. Here's the full break-even math.

Read more →
·General

4% Rule vs Guardrails vs Bucket Strategy: Which Withdrawal Method Survives a Bear Market on a $1.5M Portfolio?

The 4% rule is a starting point, not a strategy. For a $1.5M portfolio, choosing between the 4% rule, Guyton-Klinger guardrails, and a three-bucket approach can mean a $200,000+ difference in lifetime withdrawals — and the right answer depends on your tax bracket, Social Security timing, and sequence-of-returns exposure.

Read more →
·General

SECURE 2.0 RMD Age 73 + New QCD Rules: How a $1.5M IRA Owner Eliminates $28,000 in Taxes at 73

SECURE 2.0 pushed the RMD age to 73 — and a proposed Senate bill would expand QCDs to donor-advised funds. Here's the dollar-level math on what that means for a $1.5M IRA and your Medicare premiums.

Read more →
·General

Bond Ladder vs Dividend Income vs Annuity: Which Builds a Better $72,000 Retirement Income Floor on $1.2M?

If you have $1.2M in retirement savings, the way you build your income floor — bonds, dividends, annuity, or Social Security timing — determines whether you spend comfortably or spend anxiously. Here's the math on each strategy.

Read more →
·EV Analysis

Sequence of Returns Risk: Why a $1.2M Portfolio Has a 51% Ruin Rate After a Year-1 Bear Market — And 3 Withdrawal Strategies That Fix It

A 2008-style crash in your first year of retirement can cut your portfolio's 30-year survival odds nearly in half — even if your average return over 30 years is identical. Here's the math, and the three strategies that close the gap.

Read more →
·General

Roth Conversion at 63: How Converting $80,000/Year From a $2M IRA Avoids IRMAA Surcharges and Saves $140,000 in Retirement Taxes

A worked example showing how a systematic Roth conversion strategy between ages 63 and 72 can reduce RMDs, sidestep Medicare IRMAA surcharges, and save over $140,000 in lifetime taxes on a $2M traditional IRA.

Read more →
·General

Roth Conversion at 63 vs Waiting for RMDs at 73: How a $1.5M IRA Creates a $140,000 Avoidable Tax Bill

If you retire at 63 with a $1.5M traditional IRA, waiting for RMDs at 73 could cost you $140,000+ in avoidable taxes. Here's the decade-long Roth conversion window most retirees miss — with the math to prove it.

Read more →